Hello,
a bit 'of time during the day I start to think about the fact that the left wants to "harmonize" tax on the income fund, because according to them, invest in the stock market is hard and not always use this expression "play the stock market."
So, all of us, especially after the reform of pensions anyone can administer the severance pay as he wishes, take our money and how to play roulette and like any game of chance (as virtually! Scratch " ) the state offers a tax.
Who says what I think that has expertise in financial markets as Homer Simpson has the nuclear power plant where he works.
The real problem is another, recognize that you do not want to invest on the stock market is in fact a duplication of work that takes time, long time if you want to do with short-term profit (15 - 20 days). Even those who invest in the long term, however, must be kept constantly informed of the fundamentals of a company to watch, at least, the average value of the stock over the 200 days. Before undertaking this speech cmq more technical, I want you to think about one fact: a couple of months ago, following the signs of my father who is a fan of the bonds, he does not like too much trouble as me with actions, I wanted to buy the bonds in TRY (Turkish currency, for the layman) that the average have a coupon of 14% and the final dividend, if the stock you buy below par, by an average yield of 17%. However, in order to buy these securities, only those in the Turkish lira, banks require a capital investment, which varies, depending on the bank to which it is addressed, from 10000 to 25000 €.
Since 2 + 2 is always 4, I did some research that confirmed my own view: banks asking such high figures because, above all, these are operations that conflict of interest with the banks themselves and, therefore, curb, require such high sums to invest. In a nutshell, the banks that are not stupid, they are well aware of the conditions of a nation, Turkey and they invest their capital in bonds (bonds) Turkish earning 14% per year and at the same time, discourage their customers investing in the bonds referred to above.
You must know, then, that the money they invest not only money in the bank, but they are practically our money. To have a concrete example, and we recently BNP Paribas, which could not at once return all the money to customers who had invested in its funds. What would happen, in fact, had he done this? Simple, would have failed.
An important premise of the reasoning that follows is that the money that we deposited in the bank became in effect the bank's money and our customers, we only have the right to usage. It 's a bit short, the same mechanism of a straw man: you are entrusting your money, for example, a company which becomes nominal owner of these, but you, I exercised the right of use. That is, if you deposit € 10,000 you are entitled, if you need to ask, for example, 1000. Only that as the nominee also allows you to evade taxes when we have money in the bank at the end we have to pay the taxes.
You should know that information in the field of operating systems, there is an algorithm that allows you to assign the computer resources such as RAM, to most programs it is even called "Banker's Algorithm." Pretend, in short, that money is the RAM your computer. The algorithm does is to ask in advance for all programs that need the RAM how much RAM they need. If all requests can be made waterfall then assigns the RAM to the program that has requested it otherwise not.
Now, as you can see, it is assumed that each process, in our case would be the customer, declare a priori the amount of resource needed (in our case the money). Of course in reality this is not really possible.
It follows, then, that our customers should know what kind of risk the bank is meeting with the investment that is because the money you are investing our own. And instead, it is unknown to us and we no longer right even of interest on that are proportional to the gain that the bank gets.
Let me explain: if the bank makes investment in a year, gets the 14% logic to customers, who are the real investors of the bank, it should be up 14% to them but no!
Therefore, the risks we assume them to us customers, but the gain if Pappano everything.
That said, I'll talk to the initial investment is held two jobs. This summer I was also more than 6 hours in front of the computer to track news about companies, stocks and look for a potential leading sector as it was computer science in recent years (see IBM, Microsoft, Apple, Google, etc.).. To do so I read a lot of related material on the Internet, plus I bought some books on the subject that I have been helpful and I can assure you that there was quite a walk. The only
, therefore, that play, remember, with your money are the banks and some fund managers with no ethics who do more operations than necessary facendovele pay (and thus earn more than them) and that even if you continue to lose everything have their gain intact.
people Meditate, meditate!
a bit 'of time during the day I start to think about the fact that the left wants to "harmonize" tax on the income fund, because according to them, invest in the stock market is hard and not always use this expression "play the stock market."
So, all of us, especially after the reform of pensions anyone can administer the severance pay as he wishes, take our money and how to play roulette and like any game of chance (as virtually! Scratch " ) the state offers a tax.
Who says what I think that has expertise in financial markets as Homer Simpson has the nuclear power plant where he works.
The real problem is another, recognize that you do not want to invest on the stock market is in fact a duplication of work that takes time, long time if you want to do with short-term profit (15 - 20 days). Even those who invest in the long term, however, must be kept constantly informed of the fundamentals of a company to watch, at least, the average value of the stock over the 200 days. Before undertaking this speech cmq more technical, I want you to think about one fact: a couple of months ago, following the signs of my father who is a fan of the bonds, he does not like too much trouble as me with actions, I wanted to buy the bonds in TRY (Turkish currency, for the layman) that the average have a coupon of 14% and the final dividend, if the stock you buy below par, by an average yield of 17%. However, in order to buy these securities, only those in the Turkish lira, banks require a capital investment, which varies, depending on the bank to which it is addressed, from 10000 to 25000 €.
Since 2 + 2 is always 4, I did some research that confirmed my own view: banks asking such high figures because, above all, these are operations that conflict of interest with the banks themselves and, therefore, curb, require such high sums to invest. In a nutshell, the banks that are not stupid, they are well aware of the conditions of a nation, Turkey and they invest their capital in bonds (bonds) Turkish earning 14% per year and at the same time, discourage their customers investing in the bonds referred to above.
You must know, then, that the money they invest not only money in the bank, but they are practically our money. To have a concrete example, and we recently BNP Paribas, which could not at once return all the money to customers who had invested in its funds. What would happen, in fact, had he done this? Simple, would have failed.
An important premise of the reasoning that follows is that the money that we deposited in the bank became in effect the bank's money and our customers, we only have the right to usage. It 's a bit short, the same mechanism of a straw man: you are entrusting your money, for example, a company which becomes nominal owner of these, but you, I exercised the right of use. That is, if you deposit € 10,000 you are entitled, if you need to ask, for example, 1000. Only that as the nominee also allows you to evade taxes when we have money in the bank at the end we have to pay the taxes.
You should know that information in the field of operating systems, there is an algorithm that allows you to assign the computer resources such as RAM, to most programs it is even called "Banker's Algorithm." Pretend, in short, that money is the RAM your computer. The algorithm does is to ask in advance for all programs that need the RAM how much RAM they need. If all requests can be made waterfall then assigns the RAM to the program that has requested it otherwise not.
Now, as you can see, it is assumed that each process, in our case would be the customer, declare a priori the amount of resource needed (in our case the money). Of course in reality this is not really possible.
It follows, then, that our customers should know what kind of risk the bank is meeting with the investment that is because the money you are investing our own. And instead, it is unknown to us and we no longer right even of interest on that are proportional to the gain that the bank gets.
Let me explain: if the bank makes investment in a year, gets the 14% logic to customers, who are the real investors of the bank, it should be up 14% to them but no!
Therefore, the risks we assume them to us customers, but the gain if Pappano everything.
That said, I'll talk to the initial investment is held two jobs. This summer I was also more than 6 hours in front of the computer to track news about companies, stocks and look for a potential leading sector as it was computer science in recent years (see IBM, Microsoft, Apple, Google, etc.).. To do so I read a lot of related material on the Internet, plus I bought some books on the subject that I have been helpful and I can assure you that there was quite a walk. The only
, therefore, that play, remember, with your money are the banks and some fund managers with no ethics who do more operations than necessary facendovele pay (and thus earn more than them) and that even if you continue to lose everything have their gain intact.
people Meditate, meditate!
0 comments:
Post a Comment